<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slovenia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eaccessibility-progress.eu/country-profiles/slovenia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eaccessibility-progress.eu</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:44:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANED - countries - Slovenia - Facts and figures</title>
		<link>http://www.eaccessibility-progress.eu/country-profiles/slovenia/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>ANED - countries - Slovenia - Facts and figures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eaccessibility-progress.eu/?page_id=1331#comment-54</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Data from the MeAC accessibility survey (2007) showed that none of the selected public or commercial websites passed the manual accessibility evaluation. The main emergency number was not accessible by text phone, Both public television channels provided more national language TV programs with subtitling (around 40%), and some programmes with signing (but only about 1%). Neither provided audio description. Neither of the two main commercial TV channels provided national language programs with subtitling, signing or audio description. One of the two main banks had installed talking five ‘talking&#039; ATMs and planned a small number of additional machines. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://www.eaccessibility-progress.euD:\Websites\eaccessibility-progress\wp-content\plugins\kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] Data from the MeAC accessibility survey (2007) showed that none of the selected public or commercial websites passed the manual accessibility evaluation. The main emergency number was not accessible by text phone, Both public television channels provided more national language TV programs with subtitling (around 40%), and some programmes with signing (but only about 1%). Neither provided audio description. Neither of the two main commercial TV channels provided national language programs with subtitling, signing or audio description. One of the two main banks had installed talking five ‘talking&#39; ATMs and planned a small number of additional machines. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

